Moamoria Rebellion started in which year?
Answer
In 1769. Moamoria Rebellion is considered as one of the key reasons of downfall of the Ahom Kingdom. It was a conflict between Ahom Kings and the Moran people of upper Assam, who were disciple of the Moamara Sattra. Rise of vaishnavism, Ahom Paik System and internal clash among Ahom royals were the key reasons of the rebellion. In 1769, the rebels occupied Ahom capital. Though Ahoms recaptured the capital, the rebellion continued till 1806.
Source: assams.info
Discussions on "Moamoria Rebellion started in which year?"
User inputs or suggestions are welcome. The answer to Moamoria Rebellion started in which year? is provided by Assams.info team. If you have doubt or if you want to add something, don't hesitate! Use the form below provide input or additional details related to Moamoria Rebellion started in which year?.
mahendra.. tumi dalit hoi right. tumi gom pua ne nai gujaratot kenekoi dalits blakok khule aam kotol krise brahmanvadi rss bjpie mili. bengolor ba north indiar dalitor condition gom pua. tate brahmin, rajput, khatri, baniar latrine safa kori zindagi bitabo loga hoise. gutei bharotot dalitok janwarotkoiyu battar zindagi ktabo lga hoise. amar oxomot tumaluk dalit bilakor iman durobostha nhoi kio janane amar ahom bilakor karne. oxomot je mainland indiar dore caste system nai amar karnehe bujisa.
aru khonkhame ji koise thkei koise brahmanvador khilaf awaz uthaise. aru tumar dore sua seleka dolite rss bajrangdalor bamunok brahmin terrorismot help kra. ami ahom blak brahmin virodhi nhoy brahminismor virodhi.
nice info khonkham. it was bengali hinduism which destroyed ahom empire pey ong lei mungdunsunkham.
Chao is the correct frndz……It is known to me perfectly
Mr mridul. Please write a manipulate history i’m ready to read it. N brother sarbananda, if matak has nothing to do with moran. Than why the kings like raghava moran, rameswar moran called their kingdom as muttak kingdom. N if muttack is a tribe rather than religion why many muttaks write brahmin surnames like sarma, goswami, bhattacharjee. I’ve met many muttaks with brahmins surnames. N many writes ahom clan titles like chetia, buragohain, bailung n nowadays they called to themselves as tai ahoms rather than muttaks. Sarba, brother muttak originates from sanskrit word ‘Mata’ meaning sect n matak means follower of a particular sect. There r many sub groups of muttaks, bamun matak, ahom matak, kalita matak, moran matak, deori matak, koibortto matak n koch matak.
Chao khonkham Xiaophrongmuong
Dearahom representative . Your name is not understood by me . When I had gone through ur great knoledge I found that…. Belir puhoror dore hatya kisuman kothai jatybhimani kisuman ahom namor lukok feti haape dangkhonkorile huardore bikh hoi… gatike hei bure original buranji namor kisuman kitapor kotha koi… hosa.. aru tera xabar ai sanchi pator ahom pundit bure likha burhe hosa bule… bakibur sob misa bule borna hindu aru britishe bule ahom jatik hekh koriboloihe anekua korisil…
Kintu prakit bastobaiye j sivsagoror buragohain borgohain manuhe das ba belegjatir manuhok nis buli vabe… aia ai avajonor durbhagya… prakit ahom ajone vadra vabe muk rply dibo honman hohokare …aru ahomr namot dhabba keitamane abusibe comment koribo.
Chao tumi tai ahom nahay janu… tumar ans hobo hoi.. tumi ji orinial tai ahom buranjir bikhoye koisa aru axomor raijok vul pothe porisalona koriboloi goisa heya hasyakor kionu surjya chandra r puhorok tumi dhakibo pariba janu??
Tumi kuar dore ahomok brahmine hekh korile???
Kintu ata kotha tumi jona usit j tumi muk sutiya bangladeshi koba heia moi janu… kionu
Tumi prkit ahom kionu anor jatik loi gali pora misa dombhali mora aru nijok moi bor dangor aur mutkoi dangor nai.. aitu ahomor y chromosom t ase.. tumar aru bamun mridul r jukti hunilu…
Tumi proman koribo paribane moi moran aru ami bihu kio anor bihur 1 week pasot patu???? Dharma husari kio gau.. dharma husari ki??? Tumalukor jodha pandit Nagen Hazarikai goru khai aru anok khoboloiu udogoni diye… val kotha g9ru khua gahori khua haj khua tumar ahomor kotha amar gurur bikhoye kakopotharot ahi amar guruk gali dibole kobachun … ki hoi chai lua… dom ase jodihe.. beya napaba bandhu kionu tumi ahom aru moi moran amak upolunga nakariba…
Hello Mr Chao and Mridul
For your knowledge I would like to inform you that Mayamora matak moran these three words have distinct meanings.
Mayamora is the dharma
Matak is a tribe
Moran is a tribe
Many ahoms thinks that Matak is areligion but it is not true because
The koibartas of upper assam especially dibrugarh and tinisukia takes initiations in Dinjoy Sattra.
Morans generally takes initiation Bogoritolia Sattra of Chabua founded by Rongacharan ata in 1772.
Mottoks of upper assam takes initiation in Either Dinjoy Bogoritolia Gohpur or ghoramara sattra..
Thesefour sattras are not headed by brahmins…
These sattras owed their origin from Puranimati Sattra of Jorhat.. these four sattars played very crucial rule in the moamoria uprising
“Mori jam mari jam gurur rin huji jam”
I have read the research work of some brahmin as well as ahom scholar like Dr. Leela Gogoi. In their book like “বেলি মাৰ গ’ল” the downfall of ahom monarchy is due to brahmin and own misdeeds of Ahom kings. As you have said in your earlier post Aniruddhadeva is a bengali brahmin. But the true history is that he was born as a bhuyan in Present sonari. He was a discpile of Bhabanipuria ata of Bishnubalikuchi of prrlesent lakhimpur district. Gopal ata founded the famous kaalsamhati sect of Mohapurushiya dharma. This sect was non conformist and very liberal “universal brotherhood and equality among human beings ” were the main theme of this sect. I am not arguing in favor of this sect. This sect was once so powerful that they wage a great war against ahom rule and destroyed whole ahom rule within 36 years.
What do u mean to say mridu, the histories written by our ahom people in sanchi leaf r not authentic? But the duplicated history written by people like u r authentic… Oh what a joke. Hey, mister u can write a manipulated history i will also study.. N u r talking why we don’t publish tai buranji… At first try to study what people like u have done when we ahoms have published ”borno hindu e okhom khn khale” in 1998 by ur the then ccaste hindu dominated AGP. Many historians r doing their research in tai ahom history but they lack knowledge of ahom language. So we r trying to establish more n more ahom medium school to spread theknowledge of tai ahoms.
Why do not you publish the so called original tai ahom buranji ? Is The buranjis written at that time are authentic?
I think u r a brahmin who r the bangladeshis settled by the ahoms. Historically u were the subjects of ahoms so learn to respect us nor we’ll kick u out where u were originated.
Hazarika, saikia, bora are khels(job assigned to) whereas handique, lahon, buragohain r phoids(clan). Mottok is dhormio baab, those who follows muamoriya vaishnavism r called muttaks. It has divisions ahom motok, bamun motok n moran motok. Ahom clan titles r found among ahom motoks. In the same way brahmin surnames like sarma, goswami, bordoloi r also found among motoks, who r bamun motoks. Xcept mutoks there’s also another dhormio baab sutiya.
N what phuleswari? In the translated history it has been written that phuleswari was NOTOKOINYA n a daughter of Sinatolia Not, n oppressed innocent citizens. But if u look atthe naga, singphow, khamti, mishmi royal families a king can maery asmany womens he wants but unless her son or daughter can’t become prince unless she’s a daughter of king, chieftain or nobel. Same practice are also prevalent among ahoms. N according to that she can’t become queen n replace suotanpha, if so the gohains has the right to remove her. According to our tai buranji Emperor suotanpha married to the daughter of xulal borgohain her name was Anadari n after marriage she became harbeswari. There was no phuleswari in our tai buranji. These r manipulated history of caste hindus to degrade us as uncivilised n barbarian.
What political conspiracy of tai ahoms mr. Mridu? Ur r arguing with me by some second hand sources which r translated from our original tai buranjis only during colonial rule by SK Bhuyan, Edward gait, Kashinath tamuli phukon. If u compare these secondhand sources with our tai buranjis it won’t match.
The above description by Chao is totaly false. The original tai buranji as he claimed was manipulated for the interest of ahom royal family. It was a part of Ahom monarch political conspiracy to hide there misdeeds that resulted moamoriya uprising.
The above description about aniruddhadeva was totaly false. The bengali brahmin Krishnaram Parbatiya Gosain of Kamakhya temple was mainly responsible for converting fuleswari to sakta.
The surnames given that period was totally based on work. Muslims even write saikia , bora, hazarika etc. Does this mean they are ahom.
For instance Lachit Borphukan whose surname is borphukan but his fathers title is bor barua.
The root cause of downfall of ahom empire was none other than hinduism which has degradate our tai ahoms in divisive politics.
THE ROOT CAUSE OF MOAMORIYA REVOLT(From our original tai buranji)…..
During the reign of chaopha sutanpha, a bengali vaishnavite priest name aniruddha deva goswami(or moyamora mohonto) was patronized by the emperor for preaching vaishnavism in assam n establishes moyamora xotro in bengmora. He there preaches sankari religion among the tribal population like ahom, moran deuris, koch. But his main intention was to destabilise assam by breaking it’s unity. So that bengali brahmin has wage a war by using his hindu converted army motoks(majority were ahoms, there still many motoks who write ahom surnames like buragohain, konwar, gogoi, lahon etc.) n wage a war against the ahom kings which has weakened our ahom kingdom because of which we have to face burmese invasion at last we lost our land to british. Muamoriya rebellion is a drk chapter for ahoms n we’ve lost many our ahoms as motoks